Study: 1 in 4 New Genetically Modified Drugs Already Causing Serious Side Effects

MeditatingMeditating Raw Newbie

Study: Drugs made from living materials often later need safety warning

Associated Press – Oct. 21, 2008

CHICAGO – Nearly a fourth of widely used new-generation biological drugs for several common diseases produce serious side effects that lead to safety warnings soon after they go on the market, the first major study of its kind found.

Included in the report released Tuesday were the arthritis drugs Humira and Remicade, cancer drugs Rituxan and Erbitux, and the heart failure drug Natrecor. All wound up being flagged for safety.

That might surprise some doctors who may have thought that these new treatments might be safer than traditional chemical-based medicines.

Researchers found that most of the warnings came within five years after these biologicals won government approval in the United States and Europe between 1995 and 2007.

Many traditional medicines wind up with safety warnings too after they go on the market. But experts said there were no similar studies of older medicines that made it possible to compare safety issues between the two groups of drugs.

The new study, by Dutch researchers, is the first comprehensive examination of these newer medicines, a driving part of the biotech revolution.

The drugs are known as biologicals because they’re made from living material and they typically affect the body’s disease-fighting immune system. Many relieve severe symptoms by suppressing that system.

It’s that same mechanism that can result in side effects often not seen with traditional chemical-based medicines, said Dr. Charles Bennett, a Northwestern University drug safety expert. These can include brain and fungal infections and cancer.

Many are genetically engineered and Bennett said that because they typically resemble naturally occurring proteins, many doctors have assumed they were safer than traditional chemical-based medicines. But he said the study shows that’s not necessarily true.

“They have an important role,” Bennett said. “They’re really the next generation of pharmaceuticals.”

He said the results simply show that doctors and patients should be aware that the drugs have many potential side effects that may not be listed on the label.

Concerning results Among the drugs under examination are Genentech Inc.’s psoriasis drug Raptiva, which just last week the Food and Drug Administration warned may contribute to a life-threatening brain illness and infections; and Exubera, an inhaled insulin product, linked with lung cancer risks. Exubera was approved by the FDA in 2006 but Pfizer Inc. stopped selling it last year.

The study appears in Wednesday’s Journal of the American Medical Association.

It involved 136 biologics approved in the United States and 105 in the European Union between January 1995 and June 2007. A total of 41, or nearly 24 percent, got safety warnings issued through June 2008.

The results are a concern, and they underscore the need for closer scrutiny of drugs after their approval, said lead author Thijs Giezen of the University of Utrecht.

But he said the study also is reassuring because most problems showed up relatively soon after the drugs became available, which minimized the potential for widespread harm.

“If most issues are discovered within the first few years, then the system is working,” Giezen said.

Bennett says it’s unreasonable to think that the studied drugs’ safety issues should have been discovered before they were marketed. That’s because drug approval is based on relatively small studies with patients who generally are healthier than those in the general population. It often takes real-world experience for side effects to appear, he said.

Many biological drugs have advantages over conventional medicine, but the study shows their risks need to also be considered, said Thomas Moore of the Institute for Safe Medication Practices.

For example, non-steroid arthritis medicines including ibuprofen can reduce pain by decreasing inflammation, but they can cause stomach bleeding.

Biologic rheumatoid arthritis medicines Remicade, Enbrel and Humira are designed to ease painful joints by keeping the body’s immune system from attacking itself, the underlying problem in the disease. But they are much more expensive and have been linked with higher risks for potentially fatal infections. Also, the FDA is investigating possible cancer risks.

“My message to patients is that these biological products often can treat very difficult to treat diseases but may have very substantial risks and that you need to take extra care to educate yourself as to what those risks might be,” Moore said.


  • whatever, it’s just 1:4 ratio. No big deal! Ill take my chances. lol

    Just keep em coming!

    My girlfriend was in a class @ college and they started a discussion/debate on GE foods (not medicine but it’s still genetically modified)

    There were actually people in her class arguing to the side that GE foods were completely fine. They claimed that they were easier to yield foods, bugs didn’t contiminate them, and god knows what else. She said more kids were for it than not! This just goes to show the brain wash with todays community, and we (the young ones) are the future! Quite scary isn’t it? We need better education out there, not text books that are full of bogus, brain washing materials!

  • WinonaWinona Raw Newbie

    Agreed, TOL! A lot of college students are supportive of genetically modified foods, they think our high energy consumption is normal, they won’t bother taking steps to be more environmentally responsible. The screwed up world is NORMAL to them, and they don’t think anything should be changed!!

  • troublesjustabubbletroublesjustabubble Raw Newbie

    I honestly think that it’s an ignorance is bliss situation. I mean, if you think about it, when the bugs can’t take the food then MAYBE there’s something wrong with it! What makes them think our bodies can handle it?

    I get really mad when I think about GM crops. It’s so blatantly obvious to me that it’s so wrong!

  • Winona and trouble, both are sadly true!

    I love it when I ask someone, “Hey you mind if I pick your apples, peaches, pears, blueberries, raspberries”etc and they say “Be careful, theres bugs in those! They’re loaded with warms”. lol, I always reply with great! that excites me! And they always barely ever have many bugs! lol

    We need to start teaching proper knowledge!

  • MeditatingMeditating Raw Newbie

    I think the comments you posted from those college students demonstrate how little they know about GMO. Most GMO, with the exception of Round-up which is the most widely used crop GMO, were not designed to thwart pests or increase production.

    Round-up technology actually puts the pesticide in the food so when the crops are sprayed with Round-up only the weeds die. The new BIG problem is that now the pests are becoming immune to the Round-up and even stronger pesticides are needed while other plants have been discovered to include Round-up GMO via cross-pollination.

    We could be left eating crops that are all full of Round-up technology that only harm us and not the pests. Maybe one of the students could explain how that is a good thing.

Sign In or Register to comment.